Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B53145EA42 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:55:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMZfA-0002eB-Dw for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:55:49 +0000 Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so271745vcq.19 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:55:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=LWtZyMN3F4H8c3y6ng4nEekRFsL5ZRfSOgQ4CiRkcZM=; b=B/okSghi4FhQQGg7FqbRJJhhFGpsgwyGiyP1mDiruON0YTtABTZuiBhDqHiCZY9FHo lw5ayvyhqG3fsGjV7pJbRyB89jCNSSM3+/bYwnkyTeBe9DYJeuyaPdwiIIiRlrpnfEaO uvUTRvxvfRmtL3rq7zF8gxcDcURjCrn9gRXh8cpMNbQQ+Sd+dctMRmoElyNEcx3HiDI/ EXbXFYL1Z3ojlrSEYl6RSDHrrrK6/hmruYMwh+pKzJ5byT/9tnb0gzItv4t/3aSl37/l At8q7V9llJe7aoFRG8FGfes3nFu31TP/rpfneZQjzO5QtLfXVnK0xOFel2n2624kPImQ Dosw== Received: by 10.220.64.137 with SMTP id e9mr19111206vci.9.1335250535239; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:55:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.192.74 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:55:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <27416.1323836857@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <201112140139.pBE1dEo03975@momjian.us> <27416.1323836857@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Jaime Casanova Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:55:19 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ROptJx9yg8zG0TFIqlEyrTgHMfs Message-ID: Subject: Re: CREATE USER To: Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian , Scott Marlowe , pgsql-docs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkkKCWAaZPlnizKgneOmByc92FNLP7RCHlpZH8HvFzocZtaUHRuu7veH9aFGEsIi3zx0BW0 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201204/48 X-Sequence-Number: 7302 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: >> Well, I know we support the new pg_dump dumping back to 7.1, but I don't >> know what our policy is for accepting old dumps. > > We're still going to very large lengths to load pre-7.3 dumps; see > for instance ConvertTriggerToFK() in trigger.c. =A0I'm not aware of any > policy that would suggest blowing off pre-8.1 dumps should be > acceptable. =A0Yeah, it's true that the *recommended* procedure is to > use the newer pg_dump, but people aren't always in a position to do > that. > > I think it might be sane to emit a WARNING suggesting that CREATEUSER > might not mean what you think, but failing is probably not good. > are we going to do this in this release? i never was able to think in a good phrasing for this, though --=20 Jaime Casanova=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitaci=F3n