public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]>
To: pgsql-docs <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: streaming replication confusion
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:26:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK3UJRESXhFVwCT5VyDrngoV21U2Wojv6c7EpUUQfWMKCainZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK3UJRELGc4v_aoRstG8kY0JfCrt4xNUeW=uxtnwPSZ4zV5nMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK3UJRELGc4v_aoRstG8kY0JfCrt4xNUeW=uxtnwPSZ4zV5nMQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Streaming Replication wiki page[1] contains similar out-of-date
> claims[2]; I can fix some of the egregious errors myself, though help
> is welcome. The "Synchronous Replication" wiki page[3] is in even
> worse shape, containing mostly info about a patch different than what
> was committed... and it's currently the first Google search result for
> "postgresql synchronous replication" :-(
I've shuffled around the Synchronous replication page, and made some
changes to Streaming Replication, though the latter could probably use
some further pruning. Could someone take a look at the small
documentation patch?
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
view thread (5+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: streaming replication confusion
In-Reply-To: <CAK3UJRESXhFVwCT5VyDrngoV21U2Wojv6c7EpUUQfWMKCainZQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox