Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <schmiddy@gmail.com>) id 1TRZJz-00018i-36
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:06:51 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <schmiddy@gmail.com>) id 1TRZJx-00055F-O3
	for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:06:50 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id uo13so2209274obb.19
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=//exD677otmft9M1kaUjMk8kCqptLUWx5+8cRhfM9aQ=;
	b=EL+RmWlUi+ThvhqEDo3GF9fzPDEjsbW1joQ4gTkO3WreB11WSGROOGS2c/mIzBs4LI
	qr4cIabjtSOViPmsSFafKqAzCdEB23SQKovvZ2XG1ffOC7Bw8PJJMXgvBiLxHi8N7VaC
	wQIdz5gLJeyWd2f1ibWHtVGniKSr+atQT0mmCNIPquelDmNcnXVF1s6FfulMNTumd7sE
	Mnfgk2+ZZi6DWItJYuQtNfh7v8hHJlZEvdCnJEWY2s9oGABNhRMHCXvUyQ/pzl+G9dIX
	df7hyL4lxZSnIIERDzT0W4USX4yU1vCaoVdos6hWjjqqOKrh90ngmA0uPzKJw62osALd
	dM6A==
Received: by 10.60.32.210 with SMTP id l18mr18765601oei.79.1351217208777; Thu,
	25 Oct 2012 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.101.201 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20121011142814.GA4819@aym.net2.nerim.net>
References: <20121011142814.GA4819@aym.net2.nerim.net>
From: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:06:28 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAK3UJRFCoORRkwEsU=6S9eDv6+PqQ_hu+jgTw=ka7=N-L+cSbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Formatting complaints
To: Andre Majorel <aym-2lqsgp@teaser.fr>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Archive-Number: 201210/7
X-Sequence-Number: 7487

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Andre Majorel <aym-2lqsgp@teaser.fr> wrote:
> A few ways in which the formatting could be improved :
>
> a) Not so much space between the bottom of the text and the page
>    number. The page number could in fact go at the top with the
>    chapter name. As it is, the wasted vertical space causes the
>    text to shrink too much when printing 2-up.

Just to be clear, are all of your suggestions specific to the PDF
versions of the docs? And if so, is complaint a.) the same for the A4
and US PDFs?

Josh