Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T92S3-000453-UU for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 23:22:36 +0000 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T92S2-0006Gt-PN for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 23:22:35 +0000 Received: by ieje11 with SMTP id e11so6360542iej.19 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:22:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=dqCqYd/4h0UgdAFqR6Elp40SvMOkqjJeHiT+qW0zAC0=; b=B/wU/29vXpLdB6jvr4VObnt/ByWtRzoh2OLqh0JP4OgIM8ZH500gu+8OnbwEVceHXL o8DhnJ2U+RSQfeqVuKtWu9tO/G75z3uTy/9ud3OooR109q84m7JU18pRdJimNXow72RW GWFKLqzdU8SJXO8zbfw0NMiSE1GIOz1ZwON3zzOnomzdbGQGvcHfrW/XP3w+0P2IVfAC 5g08Dfn6thkOM9x2SOw07tLYtoYpqbEa8374Q4n7rCrfse80G5+5W1KSDyAmY2xaZjzJ BSCpmJoUFikU0WTsQ/fYCl3o+3g+3oW81DGGpgO37uZ2aMChbiDxkTMLPtyuRTXzCCmZ oeyA== Received: by 10.60.21.103 with SMTP id u7mr16264407oee.49.1346800954181; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:22:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.1.168 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:22:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120901155852.GC2969@momjian.us> References: <502A293E.70403@enterprisedb.com> <1344992748.25533.31.camel@sussancws0025> <20120901155852.GC2969@momjian.us> From: Josh Kupershmidt Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:22:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DOCS] Confusion over "This page in other versions" links To: Bruce Momjian , Jeff Davis Cc: Heikki Linnakangas , PostgreSQL www Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201209/10 X-Sequence-Number: 20945 On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:05:48PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 13:32 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> I didn't read the original rationale, but it's not clear to me why we >> have quick links to the documents for unsupported versions. Maybe just >> have one link "unsupported versions" that goes to >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/archive/ ? I have found the direct links to old/unsupported versions of the current page to come in handy several times, e.g. when I'm interested in how a system catalog has changed over time I can quickly open all the different versions in separate browser tabs to catch any differences. I could see reorganizing the current "Unsupported versions" section into Future Version(s) and Unsupported/Obsolete Versions, though. Josh