Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhr5m-000457-BH for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:00:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhr5k-0006I8-Nt for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:00:48 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhr5j-0006Hx-Mo for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:00:47 +0000 Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yhr5b-0006W9-QU for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:00:45 +0000 Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so5644743ied.1 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:00:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IqP9qqNvsQYY7y5Vi5YeQY5RzPpEVLzHQfpe1pBj+zc=; b=TZCbx6hBvXF1N890/Qs6Egvgry//TVW+EnD5HayrciINwN41I03YgmpOtjNRdBanZy aBnOjnt/U60OOLmFRr58aSYeWXLwCifupvxEgN4eD6Gscmxd+CZHtTIZ70E/cP9hKtZJ vPuokPwHcb1i1WKrqSRedC4BVzKsRgat1t0Lj0xG9fOTy/FVR0Ana4Li6kszBdhCXMh8 vrcXBL77mH5n8RjwLWBu5fyDbf64fxdMYjZCWTZDYyJKd/ttaIJjZd3LCQMUz6PoKLGp uTBjgvLiIVQwjXWC0nQXqNIbjFncyPCa4U893bgwIC/Cl9iFJYUAqJhtnWYYgxWUKmWB vJLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.64.76 with SMTP id f12mr23040521ici.93.1428980438572; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.64.15 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:00:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation? From: "David G. Johnston" To: "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba3fd3876ea69d0513a66f50 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org --90e6ba3fd3876ea69d0513a66f50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/transaction-iso.html Table 13-1 shows the SQL standard isolation levels and what is and is not guaranteed. Then the text goes on to explain how our implementation differs from that table. Is there any opposition to actually adding a similar table, 13-2, probably right after the paragraph, with the same columns, three rows, and the corresponding possible/not-possible cell values? David J. --90e6ba3fd3876ea69d0513a66f50 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/transaction-= iso.html

Table 13-1 shows the= SQL standard isolation levels and what is and is not guaranteed.=C2=A0 The= n the text goes on to explain how our implementation differs from that tabl= e.=C2=A0 Is there any opposition to actually adding a similar table, 13-2, = probably right after the paragraph, with the same columns, three rows, and = the corresponding possible/not-possible cell values?

David J.

--90e6ba3fd3876ea69d0513a66f50--