Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0qbu-0000jp-FQ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:25:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0qbu-0006MQ-1E for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:25:02 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0qbX-0005xG-Kn for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:24:39 +0000 Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0qbV-0005da-4s for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:24:38 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k142so119060587oib.1 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ZRUXhuT76pRCayYFliiUS+eARIhzepBc0bRTACbO0k4=; b=kmf4gUG4wqVZ9mgjzmihgr52O/vihpcDyIMqIoieiwvcXgYp5l4JJv0oYgd3k1sGkh /dJCXc6QjdfC10+qgXmmZfghlAQi9MSAhwLx5r0wRKFdI/hbilXpKrfvb0ZtljYubgiH 0PEhT7IbFGWOywNYf0TwleroLP18U08r5FUiqT/om3AjvppGbI9a55YA/jgG+3KAMruM beolBDVJ9jtS6E81H+UO36Qf75N/W4VSDUqKUoEqmHZnG9a2QBEC2/4ZF94lOjcJZPaH hifiz2IAh3K6ZyAxPZE19GEWS0U8ST0vsedIrFmRpjb/udq66uC00AFfaRp3N4rIr4M3 2qOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ZRUXhuT76pRCayYFliiUS+eARIhzepBc0bRTACbO0k4=; b=aAf1oLNjlQ4lRe+do4nQRL6acD6FwWBbh2JF4B8rfjsxwFG/w9QpDX6Hh34qwFH8aq AQ6zDaFLQ8tIHAIPvPpGrCO4az/ZhJ68BPaWJcICHqVKEwB4mKt1xJGDJTNX13q/d0O0 CH7fLiHEdEve5KX6pvl4cK1h9TMnoQbaS8FcfsS13Da9BP5Eqf39xaeC7e9LpolkgYMH K+IuYZls7CIxvQbqdULNUQmd5qH99MqP5BA/ZzWLaPpL/nhD9h6ejwqFZLc9eO+HFE/l ARF52h/KkqYWM4V8o7l1tTlnEqPKRdbHuTQrsdtL6U16FVX52I2onL4xpl2e+T6vYKtn AbIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXRwjI9vZ/NbjUysWDo3pSXVl7A9JgmVx2hg0OULuns/HJ3Qt1Ybpddr2e2Rk6ps3qsNym6FCwR8bERAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.182.69 with SMTP id g66mr5511888oif.26.1463059476314; Thu, 12 May 2016 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.47.245 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2016 06:24:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <293b7a8d-9642-6e31-e425-360a6274eaf5@2ndquadrant.com> References: <293b7a8d-9642-6e31-e425-360a6274eaf5@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 06:24:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: max_worker_processes default not documented From: "David G. Johnston" To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cf1525f059f0532a5142c X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org --001a113cf1525f059f0532a5142c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thursday, May 12, 2016, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com > wrote: > On 5/7/16 11:16 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > >> While this may be in the postgresql.conf it's absence in the docs is made >> noticeable by the fact both the immediately preceding and subsequent items >> in the 9.6 docs specify their default values. Furthermore, >> max_parallel_degree defaults to 2 but the workers come from the pool sized >> using max_worker_processes - provoking the very question as to how many is >> 2 relative to the default pool size. >> > > done > > Thanks. Now for a related question. Are any of those workers permanently in use? And what processes use them. I can think of checkpoint writer and autovacuum off the top of my head that are potential candidates. David J. --001a113cf1525f059f0532a5142c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, May 12, 2016, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 5/7/16 11:16 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
While this may be in the postgresql.conf it's absence in the docs is ma= de
noticeable by the fact both the immediately preceding and subsequent items<= br> in the 9.6 docs specify their default values.=C2=A0 Furthermore,
max_parallel_degree defaults to 2 but the workers come from the pool sized<= br> using max_worker_processes - provoking the very question as to how many is<= br> 2 relative to the default pool size.

done


=C2=A0Thanks.=C2=A0 Now for a related ques= tion.=C2=A0 Are any of those workers permanently in use?=C2=A0 And what pro= cesses use them.=C2=A0 I can think of checkpoint writer and autovacuum off = the top of my head that are potential candidates.

= David J.
--001a113cf1525f059f0532a5142c--