Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q1bhP-0000OI-8A for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 23:45:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q1bgP-0000TG-ES for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 23:44:49 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q1bgP-0000T7-4P for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 23:44:49 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1q1bgM-001XPh-9i for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 May 2023 23:44:47 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-510d1972d5aso806832a12.0 for ; Tue, 23 May 2023 16:44:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684885484; x=1687477484; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vVCuN+ceV2S5xM7IfOV1jQcMiyNDktEWVaI+LlkdTlw=; b=dyK+jQ1aoV1rHZCQMDG3hIapS9WkrIY9NfkiDyNMXdvtL0ejWHJ2DrZg3J0It10AMB EN8GxBfD4CU7TMmjBRW6h4bJU3GhZwZ/UwJp1wNuEhAEdzi8ZOugAUQiebLk4U2I6HKQ clG/KLpsOCx7Da3ji37YzeogrfqZPpNkyZflqqqePPSM8eKfHmOL8IDNfnQz+v/dJN15 bjNKnfso4TfQA5oXzgJCBt3NyYp1nvovK4XRTd/qvT1vMUokcTe+nBpYMNuU5w3SPyF2 4Z5FjmwlCgSXy62nhLv6aQrkoQyJ0oQ2YRZ6U61mVRoYukOO8AGf/2VDCVH2nNvFVQXz YPFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684885484; x=1687477484; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vVCuN+ceV2S5xM7IfOV1jQcMiyNDktEWVaI+LlkdTlw=; b=YLaXk6kQWCSvboA5QCOGl7672pH23ZufDeVDLfNC/Xpqa3qZkjKDKmO2INi5f0AWTL MsMKDizfWWiPYBnM0LxYYdGxbmdUiZvgrN1K3wIB8ajCyiHfMtnNXWPkKh65WBVV9FpI FFFwZPwcRNflAl05IgnoeQ7cE8g6kZVxsFxs/Ni3ZagYqC0IUqgy5wM52138xNNjOpxq FjSEYdTHYrOSldYohs2ZZTExqCTeuL+5erCz0jLd6O5bQi81oIS3cpMj/NNo48xS5Ss9 +DMmynA/SM5mPtxz7rXBNDPZ7DYK6ByhfYxEeffIIHp6wZCGTJwNcksFki+KeTgFE9PP HS2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyxZp5s9ZjdU5+BcSZ25MBEmNJ90xD5gziBqBmHkVbSRig6iPWs A5GkgOh7xfBOyIbPdpiCm3dNBQ33YRh31XfqRgU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5UQCCzNfpDaJQBhIXE+UPBurOl2eV9WXEWyTb5SorAgX/b0CnT5SK2zQ77Savz1VItNh1H/ZYE/N9XiOS7QLs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60d5:b0:96f:b9c9:c8b7 with SMTP id hv21-20020a17090760d500b0096fb9c9c8b7mr9911523ejc.46.1684885483549; Tue, 23 May 2023 16:44:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <168487514505.719.16546639844327379750@wrigleys.postgresql.org> In-Reply-To: From: "David G. Johnston" Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 16:44:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Typo To: Michael Paquier Cc: pspung@northcarolina.edu, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bbf86f05fc64f853" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000bbf86f05fc64f853 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:32=E2=80=AFPM Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:52:25PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > There appears to be a typo, here: > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/history.html#:~:text=3DPostgres95= %20code%20was%20completely%20ANSI%20C > . > > A word or two should be added between 'completely' and 'ANSI C', such a= s > > 're-written in', or 're-coded using', or some such. > > This is the current sentence, and it sounds kind of OK to me, FWIW: > "Postgres95 code was completely ANSI C and trimmed in size by 25%. > > I agree with the OP, that is missing something. Maybe: Between the 4.2 release and the release of Postgres95 the code was made to completely adhere to ANSI C and the size was reduced by 25%. David J. --000000000000bbf86f05fc64f853 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 3:32=E2=80=AFPM Michael Paquier &l= t;michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:=
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:52:25PM +0000, PG Doc c= omments form wrote:
> There appears to be a typo, here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/history.html#:~:text= =3DPostgres95%20code%20was%20completely%20ANSI%20C.
> A word or two should be added between 'completely' and 'AN= SI C', such as
> 're-written in', or 're-coded using', or some such.
This is the current sentence, and it sounds kind of OK to me, FWIW:
"Postgres95 code was completely ANSI C and trimmed in size by 25%.
=

I agree with the OP, that is missing som= ething.=C2=A0 Maybe:

Between the 4.2 release and the= release of Postgres95 the code was made to completely adhere to ANSI C and= the size was reduced by 25%.

David J.


--000000000000bbf86f05fc64f853--