public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation?
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:26:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKFQuwa5=DaJdjeKEsTZXhm11WW0MmQQcBdXc3rhQUEmHqXo1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAKFQuwYBN-b9QY5mSkimiR9JKomQ56v9UOKBgyGkcYAFk59G0A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:00:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/transaction-iso.html
> >
> > Table 13-1 shows the SQL standard isolation levels and what is and is not
> > guaranteed. Then the text goes on to explain how our implementation
> differs
> > from that table. Is there any opposition to actually adding a similar
> table,
> > 13-2, probably right after the paragraph, with the same columns, three
> rows,
> > and the corresponding possible/not-possible cell values?
>
> Yes, it does make sense to have a table that properly matches the
> Postgres implementation. Should I write a patch or would you like to?
>
>
I'll take a crack at it.
David J.
view thread (23+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation?
In-Reply-To: <CAKFQuwa5=DaJdjeKEsTZXhm11WW0MmQQcBdXc3rhQUEmHqXo1g@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox