Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcjN7-00050c-Ou for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:41:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcjN7-000480-71 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:41:01 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcjN5-00047s-Ul for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:40:59 +0000 Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WcjMy-0002VZ-Lq for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:40:59 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m1so155518oag.21 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:40:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=P1n+wlzpp5Y6cWdNOjaF35ykHAa8t/3cQuZRi4D5wZw=; b=daTXFWgIO4Mi8AKecrMTVtZuKO4oA9p3UGK1W0DonVRAc1SZGgFAC89lWYmD+4XYBl tkfMyH21bISsjJJZghlP/VGld00Z4hfX4RHz58xBchxOtwXgoD+fH0bGrwbPz1HVFK3T 8i6y/r4pHMNf5Nn+fpQjs1SVrWC5iQQuqv2balX6JkLurYMnhMJDCE4SpvFZxwcAk043 9HIzZ+VsM90A69tiQAKqKRF1zYAg9rbZdowYrQ4yUb2bYddnBn8cmgR6cnNbxORX93SO uPw7ApyLaxsqi4WfYufilXqRrW/E+dn8LODWYHPrO4BTemiNLWt3v7AIDAnehIKl8wiu n8Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXWl5qRHFemwy7yjMQgnnoShjcVeEZb8PldsDSHUNz1YWy3qOJsndbNy5Yq53CoiwX6VRy MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.60.132 with SMTP id h4mr2955617oer.77.1398206451074; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.176.67 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:40:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140422223230.GL10046@momjian.us> References: <28589.1396992841@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29030.1396993582@sss.pgh.pa.us> <534475B7.6020908@dunslane.net> <5344EAA4.1050605@vmware.com> <30137.1397057056@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20140422223230.GL10046@momjian.us> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:40:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) From: Peter Geoghegan To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Greg Stark , Tom Lane , Robert Haas , Heikki Linnakangas , Andrew Dunstan , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change? FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on this question. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers