Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA385EEA155 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:15:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Raj3O-0004XP-51 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:15:06 +0000 Received: by eaaj10 with SMTP id j10so427552eaa.19 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:14:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KNIE5huvrLlh5Y4ZVlYChndL16rVHuv3P1OCkhWPrfk=; b=tgMB/sRe5qZfgLCO+jSY8v7dCW0zY2J7N0nxqp8pdYAtcbDBv6upYX7qDpnNwmBZJL TshP3Z8f4gdZ8zU/qictJd+eavxyc99DDkLW5H3UZaOftUnDA1lGy2BxPeJAvddDhquz JhzEW00ohTwNYrM4j7WgiL05VjnCSpgao/WvU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.122.138 with SMTP id gg10mr286449bkc.94.1323846889130; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.66.136 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:14:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <27416.1323836857@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <201112140139.pBE1dEo03975@momjian.us> <27416.1323836857@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:14:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CREATE USER From: Scott Marlowe To: Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian , Jaime Casanova , pgsql-docs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201112/39 X-Sequence-Number: 7146 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: >> Well, I know we support the new pg_dump dumping back to 7.1, but I don't >> know what our policy is for accepting old dumps. > > We're still going to very large lengths to load pre-7.3 dumps; see > for instance ConvertTriggerToFK() in trigger.c. =A0I'm not aware of any > policy that would suggest blowing off pre-8.1 dumps should be > acceptable. =A0Yeah, it's true that the *recommended* procedure is to > use the newer pg_dump, but people aren't always in a position to do > that. > > I think it might be sane to emit a WARNING suggesting that CREATEUSER > might not mean what you think, but failing is probably not good. I guess there's really no reason to get rid of it, just drop it from that part of the docs, mark is as deprecated?