public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Michael Mattox <[email protected]>
To: Brian Tarbox <[email protected]>
To: Rafal Kedziorski <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:36:00 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01af01c34227$a6cff470$01000001@trouble>
> I recently took a system from MySQL to Postgres. Same HW, SW, same data.
> The major operations where moderately complex queries (joins on 8 tables).
>
> The results we got was that Postgres was fully 3 times slower than MySql.
> We were on this list a fair bit looking for answers and tried all the
> standard answers. It was still much much much slower.
I'm curious what the usage was. How many concurrent processes were
performing the complex queries? I've heard that Postgres does better when
the number of concurrent users is high and MySQL does better when the number
is low. I have no idea if that is true or not.
Michael
view thread (66+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox