X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A51BD806C; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:16:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50194-02; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:16:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3E2D8054; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:16:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1EA0MP-000Baw-6U; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:16:45 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: Typo in README.dist-split Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:16:44 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Typo in README.dist-split Thread-Index: AcWs65nKvCaNEIMVSD+CYnhs1ZFOvQARyKWw From: "Dave Page" To: "Alvaro Herrera" , Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.046 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200508/68 X-Sequence-Number: 8513 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20 > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Herrera > Sent: 29 August 2005 23:41 > To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgsql-www] Typo in README.dist-split >=20 > Not sure what mailing list should I be sending this report=20 > to. Anyway, > the problem is in the README.dist-split file to be found in some > version's directories -- I'm looking at=20 >=20 > ftp://ftp.cl.postgresql.org/ftp/pub/postgresql/source/v8.1beta > /README.dist-split >=20 >=20 > The last paragraph states >=20 > "Previous versions used a different, incompatible split where all > subpackages where required" >=20 > Instead it should read >=20 > "Previous versions used a different, incompatible split where all > subpackages were required" >=20 > Note the where vs. were. Thanks. Fixed, thanks Alvaro. Regards, Dave