Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634AC9FA48C; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:10:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77509-07; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:10:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from westnet.com (westnet.com [216.187.52.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987889FA61D; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:10:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from westnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by westnet.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l7TLAVnE008893; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:10:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (gsmith@localhost) by westnet.com (8.14.0/8.13.2/Submit) with ESMTP id l7TLAVfs008890; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:10:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: westnet.com: gsmith owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:10:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Smith X-X-Sender: gsmith@westnet.com cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Contrib modules documentation online In-Reply-To: <200708291239.43878.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: References: <200708290157.07968.albert@nan-tic.com> <200708291009.07942.josh@agliodbs.com> <200708291239.43878.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.185 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.922, BAYES_40=-0.185, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200708/1073 X-Sequence-Number: 106995 On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Josh Berkus wrote: > Further, you know we don't finish the docs until beta. Ever. In that context, as long as the documentation cleanup doesn't slow the schedule for when beta starts I think it would be a great thing to slip into 8.3. In fact, if those are going higher-profile, I may slip an update into the docs for pg_buffercache with the queries I keep recommending people look at. > What kind of data? On bgwriter_lru autotuning? That would be my data; HOT is in a similar category. I have many test results to pass along, and I'd like to know that the people who might help confirm/deny what I've discovered are as focused as I've been on trying to wrap all this up already, before wandering into new tangents that aren't already blocking the schedule. That's all I'm saying. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD