Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2B47697A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:27:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C8E5476954 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:26:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 24934 invoked by uid 0); 15 Aug 2002 19:26:48 -0000 Received: from pd902f0bc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.2.240.188) by mail.gmx.net (mp015-rz3) with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 19:26:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 21:30:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eisentraut X-X-Sender: peter@localhost.localdomain To: Rod Taylor Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Documentation DTD In-Reply-To: <1029381244.93691.12.camel@jester> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/1193 X-Sequence-Number: 26877 Rod Taylor writes: > Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2? Not sure if we should do this now. We're approaching the time where people should be writing documentation, not having to refiddle their carefully crafted DocBook installations. We're not going to realize any immediate benefits anyway. > What it buys is a number of useful tags, SVGs and probably more > importantly for the future, xsl and fop support which will probably be > important in the future. OpenJade hasn't had a new release in quite a > long time -- not to say work isn't needed. The last release was in January. > Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML > compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future. Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate. I look forward to it. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net