Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772E3476501 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:12:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9F3F4764B8 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:12:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 4546 invoked by uid 0); 24 Sep 2002 20:12:11 -0000 Received: from pd902f0e1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.2.240.225) by mail.gmx.net (mp020-rz3) with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 20:12:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 22:17:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eisentraut X-X-Sender: peter@localhost.localdomain To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Bear Giles , Subject: Re: SSL documentation In-Reply-To: <200209240026.g8O0Qph12753@candle.pha.pa.us> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200209/35 X-Sequence-Number: 1487 Bruce Momjian writes: > Yep, I am ready to rip, but I need someone who understands SSL to do it > for me because I don't understand which parts need to be ripped and > which parts are good. If we decide to go that route we should revert all the SSL related patches. We're past the point of figuring out which parts are worthwhile. It should be relatively possible to figure out which files and revisions where affected from the CVS logs and the patches list. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net