X-Original-To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E756B47602A
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:08:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([64.49.215.8])
	by localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8:10024]) (amavisd-new) with
	SMTP id 84092-06 for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:08:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.65.60])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A604A476122
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:43:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 22649 invoked by uid 0); 28 Feb 2003 12:43:16 -0000
Received: from p3E9E70E6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (62.158.112.230)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp006-rz3) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 12:43:16 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:43:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
X-X-Sender: peter@peter.localdomain
To: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Doc <synopsis> changes
In-Reply-To: <1046364881.91396.71.camel@jester>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302281342040.2188-100000@peter.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Archive-Number: 200302/41
X-Sequence-Number: 1675

Rod Taylor writes:

> Anyway, I think it looks as good as the old version did -- but could be
> wrong ;)  Any further suggestions?

I think the cmdsynopsis element is fundamentally unsuitable for SQL
commands, because their syntax isn't simply command + arguments.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net