public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:12:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Tom Lane writes:

> I'm starting to look at updating the docs to match 7.4 error message
> spellings.  I find that a large part of the work I'll have to do is in
> updating the "Diagnostics" (formerly "Outputs") section of the command
> reference pages.  I am wondering if it wouldn't be better to just rip
> out these sections entirely.

I agree with ripping out the messages part, but it might be useful to show
the completion tag somewhere, especially in cases where it contains
additional information (e.g., UPDATE).

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [email protected]

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Do we need "Diagnostics" sections of SQL command reference
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox