X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F270AD1B537 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:21:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91127-04 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:21:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F2D6D1B53C for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:21:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 29405 invoked by uid 65534); 15 Oct 2003 07:21:11 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-161-131.arcor-ip.net (EHLO dsl-082-082-161-131.arcor-ip.net) (82.82.161.131) by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 09:21:11 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:21:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eisentraut X-X-Sender: peter@peter.localdomain To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Need help with SGML again In-Reply-To: <200310141401.53987.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200310/13 X-Sequence-Number: 2033 Josh Berkus writes: > Per our previous discussion, I'd wanted to set up the "Basics of Config" as a > index linking to the various common options, and put the specific "how to > set" text in each GUC var description. However, SGML does not permit me to > do this. You should consider the documentation like a book. That has two consequences: 1. Linking to anything that is not a formal object (having a title and a number) does not render well in print. ("for more information, see paragraph 3 on page 15"?) 2. Lists of links are going to annoy readers. Readers want information here and now, not information about where the information is. DocBook allows you to link almost anything to almost anything, but doing that is not always a good idea. > Any thoughts on replacing Docbook with something else, someday? I don't see anything better arising. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net