X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7676ED1B4EB
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:11:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 87138-03
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:11:29 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 914D2D1B51B
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:11:24 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 21790 invoked by uid 65534); 24 Oct 2003 13:11:25 -0000
Received: from dsl-082-082-165-068.arcor-ip.net (EHLO
	dsl-082-082-165-068.arcor-ip.net) (82.82.165.68)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 15:11:25 +0200
X-Authenticated: #495269
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:11:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
X-X-Sender: peter@peter.localdomain
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310241455430.17076-100000@peter.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310241510350.17076-100000@peter.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200310/1124
X-Sequence-Number: 45806

Peter Eisentraut writes:

> Heck, ECPG has a full Informix compatibility mode and there is no
> mention of that anywhere, because there was no commit "Add Informix
> mode."

Sorry, inconsistent spelling tripped me up on this one.  But the
theoretical point stands.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net