X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABD1D1B53A for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:13:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83169-08 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:12:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BDDBD1D21F for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:12:33 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 23593 invoked by uid 65534); 19 Nov 2003 23:12:35 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-166-244.arcor-ip.net (EHLO [192.168.2.136]) (82.82.166.244) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 00:12:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:12:59 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Eisentraut X-X-Sender: peter@peter.localdomain To: Josh Berkus Cc: elein , Subject: Re: 7.4 official docs : Fonts? In-Reply-To: <200311191210.34227.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/45 X-Sequence-Number: 2122 Josh Berkus writes: > Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues > with readability. See, for example, > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html > > Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one that's a > little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult are the > function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold" italics. Compare with the "original" version: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-string.html That looks fairly reasonable to me. So the problem appears to be in the CSS stylesheets. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net