Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 15:48:23 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Cc: Atomic_Sheep <atomic.sheep@gmail.com>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Cross-Product JOIN?
Message-ID: <ZPopB6uIgkoihr2N@momjian.us>
References: 
 <CAL3CXNMes1r4s78QnMAekj9W1nchGH7dbq86wyEFB2gxqQrJ-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1667253069.131800.1684935988763@office.mailbox.org>
 <2053109544.160895.1684955437950@office.mailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2053109544.160895.1684955437950@office.mailbox.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZPopB6uIgkoihr2N%40momjian.us>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:10:37PM +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > On 24/05/2023 15:46 CEST Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I think it should read cartesian product because cross product is
> > an overloaded term and cartesian product is used more often in the documentation
> > overall.
> >
> > But the same page [0] also uses cross product when talking about grouping sets.
> >
> > [0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/queries-table-expressions.html
> 
> Here's a patch that fixes those two places.

Patch applied to master, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.