Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzLGf-00Fd2P-CK for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 18:21:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzLGb-006v3S-Oo for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 18:21:05 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzLGb-006v3J-DN for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 18:21:05 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qzLGT-004hZG-MS for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 18:21:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=momjian.us; s=2023062407; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description; bh=aVYZ+Jx9T7etsL0lwa+Ho4amUiSzCv1LZG3a1cREY6M=; b=L2eZ+ qtp2ruUhyXg9+GmFs2QZuQnriyHrXRDZWyJKtZluI/j/YzS5FYot+YR8tmDgLPWyhBpN+ebI80s1a mo6DgvPSM5OflrWiRzDsXNXHg1+0RnXGQ7Ja4Egj0+/zDdjMcCejgD8xVyzciA41Ie62TXVs/fciX mKO5XW8917o01z7mejE+T4IErLZ//OVSrWMmiKKJF5RGRw5iE5AmWFG2j1S9YiP0Dzqg8AOoQXo3b JQDZH/ULZchjyLMxmyI28r7Bk/VirLsMDoYFWVFHQJtJadcNtCoVeV2hoiNLBk4gchRtCRzvzBiAC clxi/p9yppXj3cro9GrrPKQJr06+Q==; Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qzLGO-004c63-00; Sat, 04 Nov 2023 14:20:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 14:20:51 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Laurenz Albe Cc: Michael Banck , David Burns , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Version 14/15 documentation Section "Alter Default Privileges" Message-ID: References: <4a6f157edc4ae38a2050a5893e6729cbb98113bc.camel@cybertec.at> <653b841d.a70a0220.17f72.2c12@mx.google.com> <7de5f33f49a91d7b30b8c01fe46fc280713ebae1.camel@cybertec.at> <653cce08.050a0220.a10fb.7878@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="D0U27sCFhqtKyG04" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --D0U27sCFhqtKyG04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 07:05:28AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 12:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have developed the attached patch on top of the alter default patch I > > just applied. It is more radical, making FOR ROLE clearer, and also > > moving my new FOR ROLE text up to the first paragraph, and reordering > > the paragraphs to be clearer. > > > > I think this is too radical for backpatch to 11/12, but I think > > 16/master makes sense after the minor releases next week. > > I think it is a good idea to move part of the text to a new paragraph. Yeah, kind of radical but I think it needed to be done. > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_default_privileges.sgml > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_default_privileges.sgml > > @@ -90,23 +90,14 @@ REVOKE [ GRANT OPTION FOR ] > > [...] > > + As a non-superuser, you can change default privileges only for yourself > > + and for roles that you are a member of. These privileges are not > > + inherited, so member roles must use SET ROLE to > > + access these privileges, or ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES > > + must be run for each member role. Privileges can be set globally > > + (i.e., for all objects created in the current database), or just for > > + objects created in specified schemas. > > That this paragraph is not clear enough about who gets the privileges and > who creates the objects, and that is one of the difficulties in understanding > ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES. Yes, I like your new paragraphs better than I what I had. > This is downright wrong; the "target_role" will *not* be assigned any > privileges. > > Perhaps: > > > Default privileges are changed only for objects created by > target_role. If FOR ROLE > is omitted, the current role is assumed. > Yes, I see your point. Updated patch attached. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you. --D0U27sCFhqtKyG04 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="role.diff" diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_default_privileges.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_default_privileges.sgml index 8a6006188d..4c93bdb884 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_default_privileges.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_default_privileges.sgml @@ -90,23 +90,24 @@ REVOKE [ GRANT OPTION FOR ] ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES allows you to set the privileges that will be applied to objects created in the future. (It does not - affect privileges assigned to already-existing objects.) Currently, - only the privileges for schemas, tables (including views and foreign - tables), sequences, functions, and types (including domains) can be - altered. For this command, functions include aggregates and procedures. - The words FUNCTIONS and ROUTINES are - equivalent in this command. (ROUTINES is preferred - going forward as the standard term for functions and procedures taken - together. In earlier PostgreSQL releases, only the - word FUNCTIONS was allowed. It is not possible to set - default privileges for functions and procedures separately.) + affect privileges assigned to already-existing objects.) Privileges can be + set globally (i.e., for all objects created in the current database), or + just for objects created in specified schemas. + + + + As a non-superuser, you can change default privileges only on objects created + by yourself or by roles that you are a member of. If you alter the default + privileges for a role, only objects created by that role will be affected. + It is not sufficient to be a member of that role; member roles must use + SET ROLE to assume the identity of the role for which + default privileges were altered. - You can change default privileges only for objects that will be created by - yourself or by roles that you are a member of. The privileges can be set - globally (i.e., for all objects created in the current database), - or just for objects created in specified schemas. + There is no way to change the default privileges for objects created by + any role. You have run ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for all + roles that can create objects whose default privileges should be modified. @@ -118,6 +119,19 @@ REVOKE [ GRANT OPTION FOR ] ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES. + + Currently, + only the privileges for schemas, tables (including views and foreign + tables), sequences, functions, and types (including domains) can be + altered. For this command, functions include aggregates and procedures. + The words FUNCTIONS and ROUTINES are + equivalent in this command. (ROUTINES is preferred + going forward as the standard term for functions and procedures taken + together. In earlier PostgreSQL releases, only the + word FUNCTIONS was allowed. It is not possible to set + default privileges for functions and procedures separately.) + + Default privileges that are specified per-schema are added to whatever the global default privileges are for the particular object type. @@ -136,12 +150,9 @@ REVOKE [ GRANT OPTION FOR ] target_role - The name of an existing role of which the current role is a member. - Default access privileges are not inherited, so member roles - must use SET ROLE to access these privileges, - or ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES must be run for - each member role. If FOR ROLE is omitted, - the current role is assumed. + Change default privileges for objects created by + target_role; if omitted, the current + role is modified. --D0U27sCFhqtKyG04--