Message-ID: <ad1ccc2122be3a023543c6cbe0b35e15fe088e45.camel@cybertec.at>
Subject: Re: Cross-Product JOIN?
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 23:46:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1217818053.151381.1684997995236@office.mailbox.org>
References: 
	<CAL3CXNMes1r4s78QnMAekj9W1nchGH7dbq86wyEFB2gxqQrJ-g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1667253069.131800.1684935988763@office.mailbox.org>
	 <2053109544.160895.1684955437950@office.mailbox.org>
	 <680324ce9104e3d8e9d93b040c152b8bd47b361e.camel@cybertec.at>
	 <1217818053.151381.1684997995236@office.mailbox.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ad1ccc2122be3a023543c6cbe0b35e15fe088e45.camel%40cybertec.at>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 08:59 +0200, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> > Since we are talking about Cartesian products: is the term "Cartesian j=
oin"
> > used anywhere?
>=20
> Not in the docs:

I was trying to be funny.  The Cartesian product of {Cartesian,cross} and
{product,join} would be {Cartesian product,Cartesian join,cross product,cro=
ss join}.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe