Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF44C633E50
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  9 Sep 2010 05:27:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 36058-07 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Thu,  9 Sep 2010 08:27:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from cascavel.ensmp.fr (cascavel.ensmp.fr [194.214.158.227])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D07D633CF3
	for <pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org>; Thu,  9 Sep 2010 05:27:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from cri.ensmp.fr (adsl.cri.pck.nerim.net [213.41.242.111])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by cascavel.ensmp.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/JMMC-11/Mar/2010) with ESMTP id
	o898Rhbj005490
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:27:43 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:27:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
X-X-Sender: fabien@localhost.localdomain
Reply-To: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema
 REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
In-Reply-To: <1283870946.2517.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009091026280.2626@localhost.localdomain>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008311337530.2449@localhost.localdomain>
	<2683.1283266019@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1009011557480.2570@localhost.localdomain>
	<1283369900.15386.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1009020741380.2656@localhost.localdomain>
	<1283438419.23199.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1009021959070.2656@localhost.localdomain>
	<6462.1283454730@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1009031348321.2448@localhost.localdomain>
	<22801.1283525905@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1009031920460.2622@localhost.localdomain>
	<1283535870-sup-2648@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<26284.1283536406@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1283712463.12666.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<5762.1283739417@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1283870946.2517.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Miltered: at cascavel with ID 4C889A7F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : //
	j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4C889A7F.000 from
	adsl.cri.pck.nerim.net/adsl.cri.pck.nerim.net/213.41.242.111/cri.ensmp.fr/<coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
X-Scores-Stats: 4C889A7F.000 B=0.02936 L=0.23978 G=0.00945 Agree    
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4C889A7F.000 on cascavel.ensmp.fr : j-chkmail score
	: . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.009 -> S=0.009
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201009/63
X-Sequence-Number: 6053


>> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
>> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
>
> It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
> separate section.

I agree that a general caveat is better, together with a one line 
reference in the documentation of each table with an issue.

-- 
Fabien.