Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91908650030 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:39:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35531-05 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:39:11 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from tinlc.com (unknown [72.18.206.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90A564FD14 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:39:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from biglumber.com ([72.18.206.64] helo=localhost) by tinlc.com with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcnVr-00041j-Jg; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:39:07 -0500 From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: BUG #4410: Indexes not seen right away X-PGP-Key: 2529 DF6A B8F7 9407 E944 45B4 BC9B 9067 1496 4AC8 X-Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 In-Reply-To: <16773.1220822311@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:39:07 -0000 X-Mailer: JoyMail 2.01 Message-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=RDNS_NONE=0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200809/70 X-Sequence-Number: 21360 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > Does it have pg_index.indcheckxmin = true? If so, see README.HOT. Yes, that was probably it. Is this worth noting in the documentation somewhere (other than the technical bowels of HOT)? Perhaps in the CREATE INDEX docs? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809081638 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkjFjVwACgkQvJuQZxSWSsglCACg18kkSFnwXYgf6LXxV/UC98Us jU8An3zMxd58t3A5NemfbHJ++uANYkUu =rHHT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----