X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C2830F883
	for <pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:50:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 56941-06
	for <pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 24 Jun 2003 04:50:21 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C38130F800
	for <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 24 Jun 2003 04:50:21 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19UiZ4-0003zC-00
	for <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:50:06 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19UiQR-0003Pb-00
	for <gmane-comp-db-postgresql-general@m.gmane.org>;
	Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:41:11 +0200
From: culley harrelson <culley@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: interesting PHP/MySQL thread
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:41:21 +0100
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <bd8van$abj$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <004b01c339fc$70c534e0$a322fea9@mattspc>
	<20030624000742.O5387@hub.org> <3EF7D23C.9040900@cvc.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <3EF7D23C.9040900@cvc.net>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200306/234
X-Sequence-Number: 1446

Dennis Gearon wrote:
> so,
>    if Postgres were to have a manual like PHP's OLD manual(more next), 
> that would be a worthwhile contribution?
> 
>    the new manuals seems to be drifting to using only GOOGLE listings. 
> MUCH less information on one page, not nearly as good search results as 
> the old one. I don't know why they are switching.
> 
> If google is going to do web searches for technical sites, it nees to 
> change the format.

I think they are having performance problems and they are using google 
to shift the load...