Subject: Re: Has the Update savepoint example outlived its usefulness?
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
 Pg Docs <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
References: 
 <CAKFQuwbGCdDn7FXzT3NexHebqq2mfiXr+8HOHwUwbjUL9GEfJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Message-ID: <c3e58318-775b-6142-8879-720634f8577b@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:20:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKFQuwbGCdDn7FXzT3NexHebqq2mfiXr+8HOHwUwbjUL9GEfJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/c3e58318-775b-6142-8879-720634f8577b%40enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 04.06.21 02:08, David G. Johnston wrote:
> The example in the update documentation that does an upsert using a 
> savepoint seems like it should just go away now that we have insert...on 
> conflict.  Making an explicit reference (and link) to that feature in 
> the Update documentation should be added in its place (well, under notes).

Do we need to replace it by a different example then?