Feedback-ID: ie0a040ee:Fastmail
Message-ID: <e23ad4ec-e03e-456d-9fa0-b681a6ab8a55@eisentraut.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 08:14:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation
 states differently
Content-Language: en-US
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Roman_Fro=C5=82ow?= <rofrol@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
References: 
 <CAFZ1f-9D3iCcGF8+mLgRffUp6i7m-2mh1GJ5UZbfcZiyjaXQzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <piavtdd7mhmkpzpgvxaek3hz3e2kan3c2fitn5iqta6nyrpgyl@txongxshxkxw>
 <7njdkzeco47heg6tglzsm5wmmbb56vd66f7pta6gazb2k52viu@av3wruqnylpp>
 <2037453.1699892596@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <d65bzp5h6j2lroyt3y4t7vlth76hdegjuh67dlsmxqzmzjbvtp@fdc4xs5awb3f>
 <408aa3cd-0085-41c3-855c-3d51a1bc55d3@eisentraut.org>
 <n5j5tsqbh55orr36bhpibcd7k3ckztsu75q4uhmmncbpedu4ok@vib6inzin3el>
 <78c14be8-47f2-4624-9d98-3730b492977e@eisentraut.org>
 <mmvqgl2yf76ufsb2zug7hjqmu5cqxk4wfy6lkax7beeeeqgn56@svb7qhcyno6t>
 <2657881.1700059603@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <hmbvvcjyuw7e7ujelxr4ek6mwjwzzeh5m4hsmra3xtrikk6xpo@ckg2ehfivemf>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
In-Reply-To: <hmbvvcjyuw7e7ujelxr4ek6mwjwzzeh5m4hsmra3xtrikk6xpo@ckg2ehfivemf>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e23ad4ec-e03e-456d-9fa0-b681a6ab8a55%40eisentraut.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 19.11.23 21:34, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> * Making explicit references to ISO 8601:2004 where section numbers are
>    referenced.  Mostly in source comments but also a couple of places in
>    the docs.  This is about avoiding confusion as ISO 8601:2019 has been
>    published since then, with different section numbers[1].  The pre-2004
>    editions also have different section numbers.  References to general
>    ISO 8601 concepts (e.g. week numbers) are left unchanged because those
>    are not tied to any particular edition.

Maybe we should change the references to the 2019 edition instead?