Subject: Re: overlapping ranges
To: nicholas.farrell@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org,
 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
References: <20180120205832.3624.66654@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <ee403eb1-ed28-432e-b806-940e7a7acae1@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:26:37 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180120205832.3624.66654@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/20/18 15:58, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/ddl-partitioning.html
> Description:
> 
> In the date partitioning example the first and last dates are the first of
> the month, which will cause conflicts. The last date needs to be the final
> day of the same month.

I don't think so, because the upper bound of the range is not included
in the range.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services