public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:18:45 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> You mean that we should change replication connection not to consume
>>>> superuser_reserved_connections slots in 9.0?
>>> Yes.
>
> I think it's good that walsenders can use the superuser reserved slots,
> that way a client that opens max_connections connections can't block out
> standby servers from connecting.
>
>> Preventing superuser connections from consuming superuser_reserved_connections
>> slots seems strange for me. So I'm leaning toward just removing superuser
>> privilege from replication connection again. Thought?
>
> That would be good, but I fear it's a bigger change than we should be
> doing at this point.
>
> How about we adjust the backends math a bit:
>
> Currently:
>
> ReservedBackends = superuser_reserved_connections
> MaxBackends = max_connections + autovacuum_max_workers + 1;
>
> Proposal:
>
> ReservedBackends = superuser_reserved_connections + max_wal_senders
> MaxBackends = max_connections + autovacuum_max_workers + max_wal_senders + 1
>
> So we implicitly reserve a slot and a superuser reserved slot for each
> walsender. Walsenders use the slots reserved for superusers, but if you
> set superuser_reserved_connections=3, there's still always at least
> three slots available for superuser to log in with psql, even if the
> maximum number of walsenders are connected.

That seems pretty reasonable to me.  I haven't checked how much code
impact there is.  I know Tom doesn't think we should change it at all,
but surely pre-beta is the time to fix nasty corner cases that were
added by recently committed patches?

...Robert



view thread (34+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox