Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4CE633117; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:17:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85886-06; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:17:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtp1.hi-media-techno.com (smtp1.hi-media-techno.com [195.158.241.85]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3486327E1; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:17:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hi-media-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF8993B8C; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.hi-media-techno.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.backbone.hi-media-techno.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CImryYjk6Ems; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail1.hi-media-techno.com (unknown [192.168.27.17]) by smtp1.hi-media-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB1A93B75; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.hi-media-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20532B9AE6; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:17:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail1.hi-media-techno.com Received: from mail1.hi-media-techno.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hi-media-techno.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URGIZELZZvQi; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (89-158-241-71.rev.dartybox.com [89.158.241.71]) by mail1.hi-media-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0164AB9278; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 21:17:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Dimitri Fontaine To: Josh Berkus Cc: Robert Haas , Kevin Grittner , Tom Lane , Heikki Linnakangas , Fujii Masao , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements Organization: Hi-Media References: <3f0b79eb1003300152g5327eb47w8f9aecae6002b215@mail.gmail.com> <4BB49B0C.1050901@enterprisedb.com> <19262.1270142946@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4BB4952D0200002500030333@gw.wicourts.gov> <4BB4DBEF.3010301@agliodbs.com> <4BB4EAB4.3020904@agliodbs.com> User-Mail-Address: dfontaine@hi-media.com Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:17:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4BB4EAB4.3020904@agliodbs.com> (Josh Berkus's message of "Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:49:24 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.838 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, FS_REPLICA=1.041, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/50 X-Sequence-Number: 160162 Josh Berkus writes: > Oh, I agree. Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems > counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also > limited by superuser_connections. They should be their own separate > connection pool, just like the other "background" processes. +1 Regards, -- dim