X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF1F53D84 for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:34:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06493-09 for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:34:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from h33.erkki.ton.tut.fi (h33.erkki.ton.tut.fi [193.166.84.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53C353CF7 for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 11:34:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.10.1.4] (helo=localhost) by h33.erkki.ton.tut.fi with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DXKLZ-000Ev3-Gv; Sun, 15 May 2005 17:44:01 +0300 Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:34:53 +0300 To: "Michael Glaesemann" Subject: Re: Two points about docs Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org References: <200505100150.j4A1oGa03929@candle.pha.pa.us> <55f562ab2754e9d7a018a56e88c9bccf@myrealbox.com> From: "Vladimir Chukharev" Organization: @home Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=koi8-r MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <55f562ab2754e9d7a018a56e88c9bccf@myrealbox.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (FreeBSD, build 1095) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/27 X-Sequence-Number: 2992 On Wed, 11 May 2005 10:00:02 +0300, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On May 11, 2005, at 15:50, Vladimir Chukharev wrote: >> And I still think that an additional Appendix with a list of all >> functions and referencies to their descriptions would be very usefull. >> Can you comment on that? > > This has been brought up in the past. I don't think there's any reason > there can't be one. Want to make a function appendix? :) OK, now I am trying to make the index. It will take time though, since I can turn to it only when I'm _really sick_ with my PhD thesis :) I made the list with psql \df command, and already found that there is neither lo_write nor lo_read, but lowrite and loread instead... Any idea what's wrong? In addition I can find nothing about RI_FKey_* function. Can you direct me please? > Michael Glaesemann > grzm myrealbox com -- V.Chukharev