Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ED447598F for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 18:07:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA72965; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.254.205] (cerberus [192.168.254.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g1QN9kG56753; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:09:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:04:49 -0800 To: Peter Eisentraut From: Rich Morin Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Archive-Number: 200203/2 X-Sequence-Number: 1283 At 5:38 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >It is in the nature of the way we maintain and format our documentation >that any format can be viewed as a reformatted version of another format. So, if I'm printing the PostgreSQL "books", FAQs, and the "internals.ps" file, I've got things pretty well covered. >All of these pages are theoretically worth printing. Not sure what "other >documents" you are referring to. If there are any, then there's something >wrong. There might be some (e.g., historic) papers that aren't in the distro for some reason, but would be interesting for some folks to have. Can't hurt to ask... -r -- email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - my home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta - The FreeBSD Browser, Meta Project, etc. http://www.ptf.com/dossier - Prime Time Freeware's DOSSIER series http://www.ptf.com/tdc - Prime Time Freeware's Darwin Collection