Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CFB4759BD for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from cfcl.com (cpe-24-221-169-54.ca.sprintbbd.net [24.221.169.54]) by idiom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA90247 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:48:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.254.205] (cerberus [192.168.254.205]) by cfcl.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g21LpCG56927 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:51:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdm@cfcl.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200203011940.g21Jel327136@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200203011940.g21Jel327136@candle.pha.pa.us> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:48:25 -0800 To: PostgreSQL-documentation From: Rich Morin Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Archive-Number: 200203/4 X-Sequence-Number: 1285 At 2:40 PM -0500 3/1/02, Bruce Momjian wrote: >Rich Morin wrote: >> At 7:23 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> >Well, the internals.ps paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise >> >you not to print it. >> >> And that reason would be??? Seriously, it seems like a useful paper; >> even if it isn't needed in the distribution, it may be worth printing. Peter E>It doesn't correspond to reality any longer. Bruce M>I just bloated the tarball and wasn't really for general consuption. It sounds like the paper should probably be left out of the next set of PostgreSQL volumes. Perhaps it could go into a volume of "historic" papers. -r -- email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841 http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - my home page, resume, etc. http://www.cfcl.com/Meta - The FreeBSD Browser, Meta Project, etc. http://www.ptf.com/dossier - Prime Time Freeware's DOSSIER series http://www.ptf.com/tdc - Prime Time Freeware's Darwin Collection