Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5AB632872;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:00:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 23106-05; Thu,  1 Apr 2010 02:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com
	[209.85.220.222])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D06B63357D;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:00:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so584138fxm.34
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ypgurZGNwYrh11U8WVGIkmsQLUrp+Xtoo21ow49UBK0=;
	b=MGORt5NHWlGogWATwuKSRA9u+7zyyXa5NoH+KxwGs4vv6SsSBl+qz6Zj+aFb8NJaKq
	58YIqSYyy9FvQQ+xR1dXZBl1IDOVM4/yuS2jC7qPBO330r5UbVgiACxXOGU5LnhBk/m3
	u0dz1S+ElABNoO+/vkN7cvI0sL//g7opBwsiU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=wHLloFy3l0CsK8Wf14te2UmK/LQnAgGeglDAqpe9+xR1wN45KWeqJyM3vYqt8kL5Fa
	Z0oZgycHg35vgVPh7UbiRM/KRZas9aISfeKjKGCgqPS05BCplLboUInZcNGaMANCklQz
	e8ZMR4357DWvJlYEWh9rXaQnrw1oXI9MVgiZ8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.161.83 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <g2z3f0b79eb1003311858y7f781c7u99e09e32c96aa79b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3f0b79eb1003300152g5327eb47w8f9aecae6002b215@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BB3B2ED.5080606@enterprisedb.com>
	<u2w3f0b79eb1003311850m50193801tb49b04966f5544d0@mail.gmail.com>
	<t2m603c8f071003311852x3dd15512uc92e0865ba729548@mail.gmail.com>
	<g2z3f0b79eb1003311858y7f781c7u99e09e32c96aa79b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:00:16 -0400
Received: by 10.239.190.145 with SMTP id x17mr729334hbh.201.1270087216706;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <x2t603c8f071003311900v524ab37x44f9e52a2a69dc33@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.762,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, FS_REPLICA=1.041, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201003/1329
X-Sequence-Number: 160105

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>>>> That's an interesting point, do streaming replication connections
>>>> consume superuser_reserved_connections slots?
>>>
>>> Yes. Since SR connection is superuser connection, setting
>>> superuser_reserved_connections appropriately would be useful
>>> to prevent non-superuser connections from blocking the connection
>>> from the standby.
>>
>> I think this is wacky, especially since we'd someday like to have
>> replication be a separate privilege from superuser. =A0I think we should
>> change this.
>
> You mean that we should change replication connection not to consume
> superuser_reserved_connections slots in 9.0?

Yes.

...Robert