public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

Re: Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Re: Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one
@ 2025-02-24 14:51  Rob Sargent <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Rob Sargent @ 2025-02-24 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]


API:
> * The first type never relies on fuzzy-find.

Then have that app type use the simple, fast query. After all each app/code is making an explicit choice which yesterday was the same and tomorrow will be different. 







^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one
@ 2025-02-24 15:27  Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>
  parent: Rob Sargent <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Dominique Devienne @ 2025-02-24 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Sargent <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:51 PM Rob Sargent <[email protected]> wrote:

> API:
> > * The first type never relies on fuzzy-find.
>
> Then have that app type use the simple, fast query.
>

I'm sorry, but that's neither helpful, nor relevant. --DD


^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-24 15:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-24 14:51 Re: Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one Rob Sargent <[email protected]>
2025-02-24 15:27 ` Dominique Devienne <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox