public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: Colin 't Hart <[email protected]>
To: PostgreSQL General <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: wdavdaemon / Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux and slow Postgres recovery?
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:17:09 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMon-aQz20Mv12T1RNL1T0eaWg-=nqu0WZuwVsh587rKbdf8aA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMon-aQz20Mv12T1RNL1T0eaWg-=nqu0WZuwVsh587rKbdf8aA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/2/25 06:47, Colin 't Hart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my clients has Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux installed
> on their Postgres servers.
>
> I was testing a database restore from pgBackRest. The restore itself
> seemed to complete in a reasonable amount of time, but then the Postgres
> recovery started and it was extremely slow to retrieve and apply the WAL
> files.
>
> I noticed wdavdaemon taking most of the CPU, and Postgres getting very
> little.
>
> I wonder if anyone here has any experience with configuring exclusions
> so that the WAL files can be processed faster?
>
> AND
>
> Any advice on what to communicate with their IT department about using
> this on their database servers? I've never encountered it on Linux before...
Advice, don't let any Microsoft product contact anything you care about.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Colin
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: wdavdaemon / Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on Linux and slow Postgres recovery?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox