public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Dirschel, Steve <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Hash join and picking which result set to build the hash table with.
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 16:53:53 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR03MB4001869EF0A4859686FDCF16FAEB2@BL0PR03MB4001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<BL0PR03MB4001869EF0A4859686FDCF16FAEB2@BL0PR03MB4001.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
"Dirschel, Steve" <[email protected]> writes:
> The query and execution plan are shown below. My question is
> related to the result set the optimizer is choosing to build the
> hash table from. My understanding is for a hash join you want to
> build the hash table out of the smaller result set.
That's *a* consideration, but not the only one. We also consider
whether the hash key has a flat distribution; if it is too skewed,
we might find specific hash chains getting too long.
> When running some tests I forgot to create the PK on table
> docloc_test. When the PK was not on the table the optimizer decided
> to create the hash table off the 1000 rows from collection. But as
> soon as I put the PK on that table it then decides to use
> docloc_test to build the hash table.
I think that the presence of a unique index overrides the statistics
(or the lack of any) so that the planner knows that the column is
unique and thus safe to use as a hash key. Now, it should have
known that anyway, unless maybe this is a freshly-built table that
auto-analyze hasn't gotten to yet?
regards, tom lane
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hash join and picking which result set to build the hash table with.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox