Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhLpJ-0005BV-M2 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:14:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhLpJ-0004Ze-8p for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:14:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhLnv-0002zd-5W for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:13:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhLnr-0001Os-6U for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:13:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u86JCxHW014460; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:12:59 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Christian Convey cc: Peter Eisentraut , Joy Arulraj , fabriziomello@gmail.com, Pg Hackers Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres In-reply-to: References: <007001d1f786$d903fa90$8b0befb0$@andl.org> <00a52208-3199-5858-8846-2530b0bb34df@archidevsys.co.nz> <27271.1471366764@sss.pgh.pa.us> <66b61d8b-fe76-d4a9-a983-93a94444a2a6@BlueTreble.com> Comments: In-reply-to Christian Convey message dated "Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:56:18 -0400" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 15:12:59 -0400 Message-ID: <14459.1473189179@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Christian Convey writes: > Could someone help me with a few procedural questions? > (1) This page: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch > lists the current commitfest's manager as "(vacant)". But this page: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ seems to indicate that a commitfest > is currently in progress. Is there a commitfest manager at the > moment? Fabrízio de Royes Mello is it. I guess he hasn't noticed that that page ought to be updated. > (2) It seems like there are still a few big questions about this commit: > - Is it wanted at the moment? It didn't seem like there's a > consensus about whether or not this enhancement should be > merged, even if the patch is pretty minimal. > - It seems like there are two competing patch > sets in play for this enhancement: Joy's and > Peter's. Presumably at most one of them would > be merged. These are things that reviews should be helping to decide. It's probably a squishier topic than some patches, but if you're interested, feel free to read code and weigh in. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers