Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1vKifF-0061ry-03
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:43:56 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-general-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1vKifA-00BA7v-26
	for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:43:52 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgmis@posteo.net>)
	id 1vKifA-00BA7m-0m
	for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:43:52 +0000
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgmis@posteo.net>)
	id 1vKif7-00856E-1h
	for pgsql-general@postgresql.org;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:43:51 +0000
Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) 
	by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A76240101
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 20:43:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
	t=1763322227; bh=XJS7YAjX+vt8PGBbWui+neYfYplTpC+kTq9UfJGeGIA=;
	h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:
	 Content-Transfer-Encoding:From;
	b=bAdqEsifam7rxcPQB9eiymz4pex06ZK0QoQNkuTqtxFOsqTWndHJq2VUiigrvLaIp
	 dW0zsjtnsCRBLaT7dAny5dCb2VKzihRNk8wdT11/fsSkPs8fnSAqgr7uSbCBNd8Ngq
	 hCnMoU2NqB+/k9s/222qyTlVhfkzaZQp5MmZg+/QwN4gZ1kN7NvDSqTjgp5jDP59U4
	 No74/O2Uj4lPDWDbMEz7njdSkhByLHAz6xPjDIlCfmB6ecC8mN2fHr4UbUawbDjaVR
	 8JP1k5cFX+vig+EiELh/o78YSH3ZiF1fwIyiOnUbwgjMf+m3bSb9AjUkqMXTaqqQbn
	 hfjqbsKmOgnVw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4d8hBq384Gz6tvs
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 20:43:47 +0100 (CET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:43:47 +0000
From: pgmis@posteo.net
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: RFC 9557 / IXDTF
Message-ID: <145c7185c29456e42a9325fe1df63222@posteo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: <pgsql-general.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-general>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/145c7185c29456e42a9325fe1df63222%40posteo.net>
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

does postgres consider some sort of implementation of rfc9557 IXDTF?
This is new time internet time format which extends timestamps with 
timezone info together with the offset
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9557
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFC_9557#Usage

If not, is there some suggestion on how to best store information like 
this?

Thanks,
Miroslav