Feedback-ID: i76984098:Fastmail
Message-ID: <14e035fb-ab35-4a73-a637-ad0180067b07@aklaver.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 13:56:02 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: search_path for PL/pgSQL functions partially cached?
To: Jan Behrens <jbe-mlist@magnetkern.de>,
 "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <20241227205025.1d059f72c7c08d23c9648c26@magnetkern.de>
 <CAKFQuwb4hgHH=Z6cx5Hh_qc10TCYMb1QVfP3099X1Psmyw0r3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20241228004009.267f21b78394c934f27f9974@magnetkern.de>
 <20250103135332.7910a008714abaa04d32e5e2@magnetkern.de>
 <CAKFQuwaU19_6HaB+9-L-fQhjUr8_5ACvxLAPRBhEdfLv9JVZBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20250103174849.f071d9c6942f76a9b812157c@magnetkern.de>
 <CAKFQuwZdt+YLi=9_WraRLajuOkmw4esFzbHTXmv5MwHJemdDhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20250103223312.dde69ae482776e4f1b0c2258@magnetkern.de>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250103223312.dde69ae482776e4f1b0c2258@magnetkern.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14e035fb-ab35-4a73-a637-ad0180067b07%40aklaver.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 1/3/25 13:33, Jan Behrens wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 10:16:15 -0700
> "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> 

> 
> But if I use "SET search_path FROM CURRENT", then the called function
> won't know the search_path that is set at the caller's side (which is
> what I need to make my interface nice to use).

At this point I am lost as to what the overall goal of this is.

Can you provide a 10000 ft view if what it is you are trying to achieve?


> 
> I would prefer my current solution, but I would like to be sure that my
> example (the one in my e-mail dated Fri, 3 Jan 2025 13:53:32 +0100) is
> correct. I still am not sure about that.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Jan Behrens
> 
> 

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com