Received: from dragon.universe (h0000f8512160.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.255.124]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4ELFkA94415 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:15:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from newsreader@mediaone.net) Received: (from win@localhost) by dragon.universe (8.11.2/8.11.0) id f4ELEjQ03142; Mon, 14 May 2001 17:14:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:14:45 -0400 From: newsreader@mediaone.net To: Simon Crute Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Re: case sensitivity Message-ID: <20010514171445.A3136@dragon.universe> References: <22535.989723392@sss.pgh.pa.us> <989749499.4806.0.nnrp-08.9e981bad@news.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <989749499.4806.0.nnrp-08.9e981bad@news.demon.co.uk>; from simon-news@nospam.geordie.demon.co.uk on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:21:20AM +0100 X-Archive-Number: 200105/627 X-Sequence-Number: 9496 On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:21:20AM +0100, Simon Crute wrote: > If anyone's interested, > can get away with count(), or COUNT(), in postgres it has to be COUNT(), but > this was probably going through the perl DBI, so that may have been been using count() since the beginning of time