Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0054475A1E for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:59:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from anchor-post-39.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-39.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.80]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF41247580B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:59:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mwynhau.demon.co.uk ([193.237.186.96] helo=mainbox.archonet.com) by anchor-post-39.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 18973b-0003sf-0U; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 17:00:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mainbox.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73101791F; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:57:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from client.archonet.com (client.archonet.com [192.168.1.16]) by mainbox.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F3C1791D; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:57:00 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Richard Huxton Organization: Archonet Ltd To: Florian Litot Subject: Re: log file? Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:57:08 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <4.3.2.7.2.20021105121304.022c5100@pop.besancon.tt.slb.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20021105171100.00d89ea0@pop.besancon.tt.slb.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20021105171100.00d89ea0@pop.besancon.tt.slb.com> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200211051657.08130.dev@archonet.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/168 X-Sequence-Number: 32589 On Tuesday 05 Nov 2002 4:11 pm, you wrote: > At 12:47 05/11/02, Richard Huxton wrote: > > > but the problem is it never recycle this file so i have a got a px_log > > > 2Go how i can resolve this problem? > > > why it doesn't recycle? > > > >According to the log you posted it was being recycled. > > > >How many files are there in pg_xlog and what dates do they have? > >What are the WAL settings in your postgresql.conf file? > >Do you have any clients that have been running a long time? > > > >-- > > Richard Huxton > > when this files is recycling? > because my database is always connecting > what can i do? As long as the number of files isn't increasing, all is well. The only reas= on=20 old files wouldn't get recycled is if a client might refer to a transaction= =20 held in it. It doesn't matter if you have lots of clients running lots of= =20 queries, the files will still get recycled. See my previous reply for why you have 66 files. --=20 Richard Huxton