public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
To: Christian Schröder <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Francisco Olarte <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Wong <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Memory issues with PostgreSQL 15
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:26:03 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <LO0P265MB270002E8C8CC879FE082A824F9AB2@LO0P265MB2700.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <LO0P265MB2700E0D30CC9A427956FC121F9F02@LO0P265MB2700.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
	<CA+bJJbyzFdr1i1Yarqt=JnsN0WUg+veRvYZC1+kaYnWFGjiYRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<LO0P265MB2700F3C159F47D8F039D6B1FF9F12@LO0P265MB2700.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
	<[email protected]>
	<LO0P265MB270002E8C8CC879FE082A824F9AB2@LO0P265MB2700.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 10:58 +0000, Christian Schröder wrote:
> The current error messages are similar to what we have seen before:
> 
> <2024-07-25 12:27:38 CEST - > LOG:  could not fork autovacuum worker process: Cannot allocate memory
> <2024-07-25 12:27:38 CEST - mailprocessor> ERROR:  could not resize shared memory segment "/PostgreSQL.1226901392" to 189280 bytes: No space left on device
> 
> As far as I understand, it does not make much sense to look into SysV shared
> memory (which is what ipcs does). Indeed, there is only the same small shared
> memory segment as we have seen back then:
> 
> [...]
>
> Francisco and Tom both pointed at Posix shared memory instead; however, this
> also does not seem to be used a lot:
> 
> # df -h /dev/shm
> Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> tmpfs           7.8G  6.6M  7.8G   1% /dev/shm
> 
> We also still see a lot of available memory:
> 
> # free -m
>               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
> Mem:          15882        6966         191        2109        8725        6477
> Swap:          1999         271        1728
> 
> Again, exactly the same situation as before.
> 
> Tom suggested that we hit some kernel limits, but I could not find any related
> kernel setting. The only limit I am aware of is the size of the /dev/shm filesystem
> itself. This could be changed, but the default value of 8 GB (which is half of
> the machine's memory) seems to be enough (given that it is not even used).
> 
> Is there anything else I can analyze? Sorry again for reviving this old thread.

It could be dynamic shared memory segments created temporarily during parallel
query execution.

Try setting "max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0", that should make that problem
disappear.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe






reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Memory issues with PostgreSQL 15
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox