Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:29:53 +0200
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
Sender: depesz@depesz.com
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump?
Message-ID: <20210826142953.GA27889@depesz.com>
Reply-To: depesz@depesz.com
References: <20210826084430.GA26282@depesz.com>
 <648517.1629986527@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20210826140827.GA15868@depesz.com>
 <649446.1629987629@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <649446.1629987629@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210826142953.GA27889%40depesz.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:20:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:02:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> >>> Wouldn't it be possible to get all type formats at once, and cache them
> >>> in pg_dump? Or at the very least reuse already received information?
> 
> >> Send a patch ...
> 
> > Yeah, that's not going to work, my C skills are next-to-none :(
> > I guess I'll have to wait till someone else will assume it's a problem,
> > someone with skills to do something about it.
> 
> Well, you could move it forward by doing the legwork to identify which
> queries are worth merging.  Is it really sane to do a global "select

Sure. On it. Will report back when I'll have more info.

Best regards,

depesz