Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:52:53 +0200
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
Sender: depesz@depesz.com
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
	Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>,
	pgsql-general <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump?
Message-ID: <20211021105253.GA20301@depesz.com>
Reply-To: depesz@depesz.com
References: <649446.1629987629@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20210826160644.GA3120@depesz.com>
 <e6a7503afd115d111fbb96c5787906d73cfe2605.camel@cybertec.at>
 <896732.1630099403@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20210830074442.GB15241@depesz.com>
 <1349119.1630332682@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20210830144551.GA27054@depesz.com>
 <1351364.1630335487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1414363.1630341759@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <2276059.1634766361@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2276059.1634766361@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211021105253.GA20301%40depesz.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:46:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Anyway, it doesn't look like there's much hope of improving this
> > aspect without a significant rewrite.
> 
> Just to close out this thread: I've now posted such a rewrite at
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2273648.1634764485%40sss.pgh.pa.us

That looks amazing. Thanks a lot.

Best regards,

depesz