Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1szZ3k-006hg2-MI for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:09:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1szZ3j-000eO2-0H for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:09:15 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1szZ3i-000eH0-Ka for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:09:15 +0000 Received: from mail.hjp.at ([212.17.106.138] helo=rorschach.hjp.at) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1szZ3c-000VMO-UG for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 10:09:13 +0000 Received: by rorschach.hjp.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CF508CA9; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:09:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:09:05 +0200 From: "Peter J. Holzer" To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Questions about document "Concurrenry control" section Message-ID: <20241012100905.lkba5t3pbrrs4cg6@hjp.at> Mail-Followup-To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org References: <7901c7e4-69c6-4bb2-8e9d-ad556d493717@iseki.space> <35d3e799d47700dc217b1f211aa0e0d5f4de4e67.camel@cybertec.at> <7d36a2bd-3aae-4785-b8b3-ab14cca8fdc0@iseki.space> <2852693.1728656353@sss.pgh.pa.us> <32ae50a3-b6a3-4ca2-8051-9b0261ac430b@iseki.space> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7yef24arxbjhbjwc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32ae50a3-b6a3-4ca2-8051-9b0261ac430b@iseki.space> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --7yef24arxbjhbjwc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2024-10-12 10:25:08 +0800, iseki zero wrote: > So, should I use the [reply to all] button? This mailing-list (like most lists) sets the "List-Post" header: List-Post: So the best thing would be for the mail program to detect that and offer a [reply to list] button. Not many do, though, so [reply to all] is probably your best choice. > I'm afraid the receipt list will growing to have too many address. Not much of a problem since usually there won't be that many people participating in a thread. > BTW, I'm using Thunderbird. If you have better software, tell me please. I'm using (neo)mutt, but these days the limitations of a text-only mailer can be quite noticeable. hp --=20 _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality. |_|_) | | | | | hjp@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!" --7yef24arxbjhbjwc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEETtJbRjyPwVTYGJ5k8g5IURL+KF0FAmcKSrsACgkQ8g5IURL+ KF1BnA/+IWihtjHvKnGA6mb11FbUlZTyDX/BJTIsfiZVhq1vjL2CpEYmPq13OZqT KJp4p+6xEsVDWIXGkAceqRXZfH1GyYTXA/mJcKs8TZ1Sgo/4p00AUlN55dUqCN6i k1bBRzRyO+OOABccWOkFVPlKcaevALtsAZnQTmAo/wuxvQIt96e4xR/x0WawWbHq VXEx1uOdNhE+n7Ykw/9nYcNEiZsEuGaRMz02CfczlbajftKDciOTOjPgjU7gFBcs 4732AY89Y1vYyghy23YHZtUWp0uxBwC9Yb/fx5UhSegfhlDqWSFkfs1sNZMG2zUC 43QEAS9yTE/1LxfjLwffOYG2HUfschvdWLN7hAmZrvn0U4zEipAcHsjyw4varvL3 pidGYN2qlcFV5xIXyZfH717l46+2oZpik4sRSVIDlrKWZ2a4pK6HyhCV7mgEkfLd +E8P/n6fFJY/s/ivsFCH3OBet9vN8Ozp6wjnpE011PxcHHZZSDt50aPaq+zwSW02 7+A9Ltw8jUCCD6g75QtuSidzUwFxaKKFXJGcZg0IIr69OeE12Yn/X0g2ECCKn/m6 iRT2n6CPfwnRGEWPE309rEi/nlPaAOzpjfxhrrK+rPG/gPXlN3jdUDWWf6k/jVS6 idzha+R7C2X+EEaiV4f7mM2xZjZQlmps9YPvKquAHQKIsjEUV9c= =t/BO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7yef24arxbjhbjwc--