public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Michel Pelletier <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:32:11 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxu=v+ZyWad6JpToJrUhTTYJneMsTGwGdgNCb39QaG7Tc359Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACxu=vJaKFNsYxooSnW1wEgsAO5u_v1XYBacfVJ14wgJV_PYeg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=vLXvpzN4X3k+9jsMt6ujuOvFVUSkA80t_cROSsF4y2jQQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=vKEF8Qa-OaADFxf0uMg-xw6gH_CNCWd2s+xaqh-gY4=xg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=v++HNmss59yGUDkRny7g=M8tZ2YXF07AUXqKVGqcSfxGQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=v+dn37zr8gx5xNP-EZY3OLtGLTHrbx_ZkCQc40HpyMLKA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=vL7i_U_iSNpREe8eCAMEyKHuPpk9THRpBhk+ar0U1EdOw@mail.gmail.com>
<CACxu=vKLc6f5N8_DR58LKkE1eohWSxTvThTeGsLm7p7QH1aFBA@mail.gmail.com>
<CACxu=vJf2S=ysun_h=zmYNu6oUM47+egbpX5mMC0X9BJK=EQwQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CACxu=vK+S6BXN8ZYyBvqQBWrcwHXqtue1-ZuKO3+XtHGBYcDUQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRCd6xcH-AYEyHFdGdU89O9JjZ-v-pyQnOwd9zNJkCEdhQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=! [email protected]>
<CACxu=vL4g2pPgEg66F-ttZ5jVuMba8K31vsoEYKbTJ7q6jk0hg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=vKjvJSftCgBPa78tbdpBnJOq9DCrtV8x=o0_cuCOoxLbA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CACxu=v+ZyWad6JpToJrUhTTYJneMsTGwGdgNCb39QaG7Tc359Q@mail.gmail.com>
Michel Pelletier <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 8:26 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2. If the problem is primarily with passing the same object to
>> multiple parameters of a function, couldn't you detect and optimize
>> that within the function?
> Ah that's a great idea, and it works beautifully! Now I can do an
> efficient triangle count without even needing a function, see below
> expand_matrix is only called once:
Nice!
> That pretty much resolves my main issues. I'm still in an exploratory
> phase but I think this gets me pretty far. Is this something that has to
> wait for 18 to be released? Also do you need any further testing or code
> reviewing from me?
Yeah, this is not the kind of change we would back-patch, so it'll
have to wait for v18 (or later if people are slow to review it :-( ).
I don't think there's anything more we need from you, though of course
you should keep working on your code and report back if you hit
anything that needs further improvement on our end.
regards, tom lane
view thread (34+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox