Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uY7GQ-001Koi-0F for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2025 18:05:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uY7GN-008hsn-W5 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2025 18:05:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uY7GN-008hsf-Kn for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2025 18:05:24 +0000 Received: from mail94.out.titan.email ([54.235.81.176]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uY7GL-005vkE-1H for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2025 18:05:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out.flockmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08F0100012 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2025 18:05:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=MvB1zG9021VhtlLR6yhe2JmNixp41DjomX2NJxJ1w7A=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pfortin.com; h=to:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:cc:reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=titan1; t=1751738719; v=1; b=B6kbjEw0APi8b7JLKAAd84OHudSBkAaDHS6TXCWKmmBAX+dQoXZJ13GB3MSDvJryEHvFOmML LWYJHnk6weB1G+93ZKAWinEwvoKFBGJKK6izOcjj57+Nmhn7KW9g2BoYqZxnVwnMw6x2B+XLz2i wfSmikHxDDhRTSIcO0/Sisns= Received: from pfortin.com (h194.51.155.207.dynamic.ip.windstream.net [207.155.51.194]) by smtp-out.flockmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6577A10000B for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2025 18:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 14:05:18 -0400 Feedback-ID: :pf@pfortin.com:pfortin.com:flockmailId From: pf@pfortin.com To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: can I use same binary for old & new? Message-ID: <20250705140518.784aa50e@pfortin.com> In-Reply-To: <7265.1751735095@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <20250705125207.31b4d475@pfortin.com> <7265.1751735095@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1git142 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-F-Verdict: SPFVALID X-Titan-Src-Out: 1751738719557074913.20113.8725762889512967402@prod-use1-smtp-out1002. X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=c+lRQQ9l c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6869695f a=qh1+orYxbfpu+9ysfXJjVg==:117 a=qh1+orYxbfpu+9ysfXJjVg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=CEWIc4RMnpUA:10 a=vJnAvOe7lnr1byGQU0gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Sat, 05 Jul 2025 13:04:55 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: >You cannot do pg_upgrade without a copy of the old postgres >server binary as well as the new one. Bummer. Wish I had skills & time to try to overcome this... Thanks! Pierre