Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [216.151.103.158])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4D39vA91700
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 12 May 2001 23:09:57 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4D39qR22538;
	Sat, 12 May 2001 23:09:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Simon Crute" <simon-news@nospam.geordie.demon.co.uk>
cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: case sensitivity 
In-reply-to: <989663219.7512.0.nnrp-08.9e981bad@news.demon.co.uk> 
References: <989663219.7512.0.nnrp-08.9e981bad@news.demon.co.uk>
Comments: In-reply-to "Simon Crute" <simon-news@nospam.geordie.demon.co.uk>
	message dated "Sat, 12 May 2001 11:23:10 +0100"
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 23:09:52 -0400
Message-ID: <22535.989723392@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200105/568
X-Sequence-Number: 9427

"Simon Crute" <simon-news@nospam.geordie.demon.co.uk> writes:
> As separate point, postgres seems to be bothered about case a lot more than
> oracle.

AFAIK we're exactly as picky about it as Oracle, just in the opposite
direction.

			regards, tom lane